The Pan-African
Parliament (PAP), during its plenary sitting on Thursday at the Sixth Ordinary
Session of the Sixth Legislature, held the First Reading and Debate on
the Draft Model Law on Implementation of Decisions of African Human Rights
Bodies. The presentation marks a significant step in Africa’s ongoing
effort to strengthen the continental human rights system and enhance compliance
with decisions of African human rights institutions.
The session was presided
on behalf of the President of the Pan-African Parliament, H.E. Chief Fortune
Charumbira, by the Fourth Vice-President, Hon. Djidda Mamar Mahamat. The
report was presented by the Acting Chairperson of the Committee on
Justice and Human Rights, who outlined the background, objectives, and key
provisions of the Draft Model Law. He was joined by technical
contributions from the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, and Mr.
Clement Mavungu, PAP Legal Officer.
Advancing Human Rights
Enforcement in Africa
In his opening remarks,
the Acting Chairperson of the Committee on Justice and Human Rights recalled
that the Draft Model Law was developed in response to Resolution
PAP.6/PLN/CJHR/RES/04/JUN.24, through which the Parliament mandated the
Committee “to propose a model legal instrument to guide a harmonised domestic
implementation of decisions of African human rights bodies.” The initiative
arose from persistent concerns about the slow or non-implementation of
judgments and recommendations from key continental institutions, notably
the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the African
Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and the African Committee
of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.
“The credibility of
Africa’s human rights system depends on whether decisions of these bodies are
implemented effectively at national level,” he said. “This Model Law will help
Member States overcome legal and institutional barriers that have for too long
undermined the enforcement of human rights judgments.”
A Comprehensive Legal
Framework
The Draft Model Law,
tabled for first reading, provides a detailed framework to guide
African Union (AU) Member States in establishing or strengthening
national legislation and mechanisms to ensure that decisions of African human
rights bodies are duly executed.
The Law defines clear
institutional responsibilities, beginning with the Ministry of Justice
or Attorney General as the competent national authority for
implementation, and introduces a National Implementation Coordination
Mechanism: a multi-stakeholder platform bringing together ministries, the
judiciary, national human rights institutions, and civil society to monitor and
report on compliance.
It also elaborates
procedural mechanisms for:
· Registration and enforcement of human rights decisions in domestic
courts;
· Execution of reparations and compensation ordered by African human rights bodies;
· Implementation of provisional measures and non-pecuniary remedies such
as rehabilitation, release, and guarantees of non-repetition; and
· Parliamentary oversight over state compliance and budgetary
allocations for implementation.
Contributions from Technical
Experts
Presenting on behalf of
the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, the
institution’s legal experts commended PAP’s leadership in operationalizing
Africa’s shared human rights commitments through legislative innovation. They
described the Draft Model Law as “a powerful tool to bridge the gap between
regional decisions and national practice,” noting that many AU Member States
lack enabling legislation to domesticate judgments of African human rights
bodies.
“This Model Law offers a
harmonized, African-grown solution to a long-standing challenge,” one presenter
explained. “It empowers states to act promptly and consistently when
continental human rights bodies issue binding or recommendatory decisions.”
Mr. Clement Mavungu, PAP Legal Officer, provided a detailed
technical briefing on the structure of the Model Law, explaining its three
core pillars:
1. Legal
enforceability: ensuring that decisions of African human rights bodies
carry the same authority as domestic court judgments;
2. Institutional
coordination: creating national mechanisms for follow-up, data management,
and reporting; and
3. Victim-centred
reparations: embedding human dignity, non-discrimination, and access to
effective remedies as guiding principles.
He emphasized that the
Model Law draws inspiration from comparative practices in other regions such as
the Inter-American and European systems while remaining grounded in Africa’s
own legal traditions and constitutional frameworks.
Members Commend the
Initiative
During the ensuing
debate, Members of the Pan-African Parliament lauded the Committee’s foresight,
describing the draft as a milestone toward restoring the legitimacy and
effectiveness of the African human rights system. Legislators stressed that
parliaments, as representatives of the people, have a duty to ensure national
accountability for decisions of supranational bodies.
Several Members called
for stronger parliamentary oversight provisions, including
mandatory reporting by governments to their national assemblies on the status
of implementation of African Court judgments and African Commission
recommendations. Others highlighted the importance of including budgetary
lines for reparations and implementation measures in national budgets.
“Human rights without
enforcement are only words on paper,” one Member remarked. “This Model Law
provides the missing link between our continental commitments and the lived
reality of African citizens.”
Key Innovations of the
Draft Model Law
The Draft Model Law
introduces several groundbreaking innovations:
· Establishment of a National
Implementation Coordination Mechanism to ensure multi-sectoral
collaboration;
· Mandatory registration of African human rights decisions in domestic
courts, giving them the same effect as national judgments;
· A defined process for payment of
compensation, rehabilitation, and re-opening of cases in
compliance with human rights rulings;
· Sanctions for public officials who fail
to implement decisions; and
· Provisions for parliamentary reporting,
transparency, and public access to information on implementation.
Next Steps
Following the First
Reading, the Draft Model Law will undergo regional consultations across
Africa to gather inputs from governments, parliaments, national human rights
institutions, civil society, and academia. The Committee on Justice and Human
Rights will thereafter integrate the feedback and present a revised
version for Second Reading and adoption during a subsequent session.
The Acting Chairperson
concluded by reaffirming PAP’s determination to use its legislative and
oversight mandate to ensure that African human rights decisions
translate into concrete justice for victims across the continent.
“The Pan-African
Parliament stands as the people’s voice for accountability. With this Model
Law, we are not only harmonizing legal frameworks: we are bridging the gap
between human rights ideals and their realization in daily life.”
Why It Matters
The Model Law on Implementation of Decisions of African Human Rights Bodies complements PAP’s broader legislative agenda to promote human rights, democracy, and good governance under Articles 3 and 11 of the PAP Protocol. Once adopted, it will serve as a model for AU Member States to give legal effect to decisions of African human rights institutions, strengthening Africa’s collective commitment to justice, the rule of law, and the protection of human dignity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News