The Southern Regional Caucus in the Pan African Parliament (PAP) has bemoaned
the unwarranted delay in organizing the Bureau election mandated by the
Executive Council (Council) of the African Union (AU) at the 39th Ordinary
Session of the Executive Council, 14-15 October 2021, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
The
Caucus pointed out that the Council’s directive to hold PAP bureau election without delay, ”considering the urgency of the
matter" was clear and not contingent on any other condition and wondered why
the African Union Commission (Commission) should insist on holding consultations
with the other regional caucus as a condition precedent to organizing the election”
This was
contained in a statement by the Caucus to the Council which commenced its 40th
Ordinary Session today Wednesday a copy of which was forwarded to the African
Parliamentary News.
The Caucus
specifically noted the direct, clear and unambiguous language of paragraph 17
of the Council decision “that in
consideration of urgency of the matter, this decision shall be
implemented with immediate effect”.
“In spite of
the clear, explicit and unambiguous language of the said Executive Council
Decision of October 2021 directing that elections be held "as soon as
possible", there has been no movement on the matter till date”.
The Caucus pointed out that nowhere in the decisions of the 39th Session of the Executive
Council was there a requirement for the Commission to hold consultations with
the other regional caucuses before the election neither was there a stipulation
that such consultations should be a pre-condition for the convening of the
election session.
“It is therefore unreasonable to hinge
the non-implementation of the Council decision on a provision that was not contained
in the decision”.
According to the statement, “paragraph 17 of the said
decision clearly shows that the Council intended that normalcy in the running
of the Pan African Parliament should urgently be restored. It is therefore
frustrating that for almost two years, the AU has been spending about eight
million dollars ($8 million) annually, totaling almost seventeen million
dollars ($17 million) in two years on staff for a parliament that has not been
sitting. Is it not time for the Union to start expecting value for the money it
spends on the Parliament?”
“The reasons advanced to delay
elections are unacceptable. The elections should be held latest end of
March. We do not require more than a month to hold an Extra Ordinary Session
for elections of PAP bureau. The rules require two weeks but we can give even 4
weeks’ notice and still hold elections before end of March. Notice should be
given by mid February to National Parliaments and Host country. South African
Government is more than ready to host if given 3 week–notice from mid February
as she is aware of her obligation to host PAP Statutory meetings in March every
year”.
“Article 14(3) of
the PAP Protocol gave the Executive Council power to request for an
extra-ordinary session of the parliament which in the instant case, is for the
sole purpose of conducting elections for the bureau of the parliament as well
as the leadership of the regional caucuses and permanent committees. Such an
extra-ordinary session requires 14-day notice as provided in Rule 31(1) of
PAP’s Rules of Procedure and not a 21-day notice”.
“It is a matter of
record that PAP Statutory meetings are held in March, May, August and October
annually. Since 2004, the AU and the National Parliaments routinely make
budgetary provisions for those statutory meetings in terms of travel and per
diem, scheduling the election session in March 2022 will not inconvenience or
prejudice any country delegation”.
“In
this regard, we refer to the progress report by the delegation that met South
Africa’s Minister of Foreign Affairs on September 30 which stated that the
Minister informed the delegation that she is in receipt of report of auditors
that raised a number of seeming violations of the funding provided by AU and
the host government. The PAP Protocol did not envisage a PAP that would be run
undemocratically by an unelected sole administrator!”
“The PRC observation that “underscored
the importance of adhering to the decision of prioritizing the holding of PAP
elections, rather than focusing on consultations with relevant caucuses” captures
the urgency of the issue at hand”.
“We submit that in line with
recommendation of the PRC, the month of February 2022 should be used to prepare
and give the required notices for the election session while the session should
be held in March 2022 which is a statutorily calendared month for PAP Committee
Sittings. This will also ensure that the new leadership will have adequate time
to prepare for the statutory May 2022 session in compliance with Article 14 of
the Protocol and Rule 28 of the PAP Rules of Procedure as well as the retreat
mandated by the Council”.
It would be recalled that following
the disagreement over regional rotation of the presidency of PAP, the AUC Chairperson directed then
Acting PAP President Hon. Chief Fortune
Charumbira to suspend the session for one month which has now turned into
eight months. Yet the AUC is saying that they cannot conduct election in March
2022. This is condemnable considering the fact that when the Council took the
decision in October to take immediate effect, the Commission did raise any
issue as to its ability or preparedness to comply. This is February 2022, three
months later and the Commission is insisting that it cannot expeditiously
implement the said Council decision. Is this not a clear case of sabotage? Is
this not undermining the power and authority of the Council to resolve issues
among organs of the Union? Is this not setting a bad and dangerous precedent?
Under what provision of the Constitutive
Act of the African Union or the Protocol establishing PAP is the Commission relying on since decisions of the Council are
binding on all organs and institutions of the Union as well as member states.
We
expect the Council to be outraged by failure as well as the reasons given by
the Commission to comply with its October 2021 after three months considering
the urgency of the matter. The Council should not be seen as a toothless bull dog.
This is particularly so since the October 2021 Council decision on PAP as published in the AU website https://au.int/sites/default/files/decisions/41233-OSC51633_-_EX.CL_Decisions_E.pdf did not contain any requirement for regional consultations before the election. The decision did not give the Commission any discretion on its implementation and did not contain
any
language that could be
interpreted as mandating
the Commission to hold consultations with the other regional causes before the election on the basis of
which it claimed that it could not urgently comply with the Council decision.
Going by the said decision, the
Commission was expected to present a progress report on the implementation of
the October 2021 decision on PAP in
view of the urgency of the matter. It has failed to do so unapologetically,
insisting on taking its time to implement it at her convenience.
Article
12(5) of the PAP Protocol provides that the Bureau of the Parliament shall be
responsible for the management and administration of the affairs and facilities
of the Pan-African Parliament and its organs. To ensure compliance with this
requirement, the Council should recall the Interim Bureau of the Parliament if
the Commission insists that it is unable to conduct the bureau election in
March which is a statutory meeting month. It is against the provisions of the
PAP Protocol to continue to allow the Clerk to run the affairs of the
Parliament as a sole administrator!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News