Sixteen
chieftains of the All Progressives Congress (APC) led by led by Mr Chukwuma
Odu, have asked the Federal High Court, Abuja, to restrain the party’s
Caretaker Committee in Ebonyi, headed by Mr Aloy Nwibo, from overseeing its
affairs.
The
chieftains also asked the court to stop the Nwibo-led committee from
registering and revalidating membership of party members in the state.
They
also asked the court to restrain APC, its Chairman, Caretaker Extra Ordinary
Convention Planning Committee, Governor Mai Mala Buni; APC National Caretaker
Committee and the National Executive Committee listed as the 1st, 2nd , 3rd and
4th defendants from recognizing and accepting the Nwibo-led caretaker
committee.
In
an originating summons filed by the plaintiff, they said that the Nwibo
Caretaker Committee was unlawfully constituted and should not be recognized as
APC Caretaker Committee in Ebonyi in place of Jeff Ogbu and John Okochi who
were duly elected officers.
Nwibo,
Okoro and Igboke were listed as the 7th, 8th and 9th defendants in the suit
filed on behalf of the chieftains by Mr B Igwilo (SAN) and Mr Obed Amazu.
When
the matter came up, Amazu, who is the lead counsel for the plaintiffs, prayed
the court for a short adjournment to enable him to effect service on some of
the defendants that were not present in court.
Amazu
said that a short adjournment was necessary to safeguard the subject matter.
In
a brief ruling, the vacation judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the
matter until September 1.
The
plaintiffs are asking the court to grant four declarations bordering on alleged
breach of APC rules, particularly Article 47 (i), (ii) and (iii) of the APC
Constitution 2014.
“A
declaration that the purported constitution and recognition of a caretaker
committee led by the Nwibo, Igboke and others made up of non-members of the APC
to take over the activities of elected members of Ebonyi is in breach of
Article 9 (I) of the APC 2014 and the 4th defendants (All Progressives Congress
National Executive Committee’s) resolution-decision of Dec. 8, 2020.
“A
declaration that by the said ‘Resolution of December 8, 2020, the 5th and 6th
defendants and other composed members remain the valid state working committee
of the APC Ebonyi .”
The
plaintiffs posed eight questions for determination by the court, including
“whether by the provision of Article 17 (I) (ii) (IV) of APC Constitution 2014
, the 1st to 4th defendants were right to dissolve the duly elected Ebonyi
working Committee of APC in Dec. 2020.
This,
according to them, took place while the duration of their tenure in office is
still subsisting until 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News