PAP President Rt. Hon. Roger Nkodo DANG |
By Olu Ibekwe (oluchukwuibekwe@gmail.com)
The African Union was formed by a
Constitutive Act which established a codified framework under which the AU is
to conduct its business and thus marked a departure from the seeming
authoritarian political order under the OAU and reflected a new thinking in
African politics in the 21st century.
Ten organs were established by the AU
Constitutive Act and of the ten organs , four namely the Pan African
Parliament, the Court of Justice, the Peace and Security Council and the
Financial Institutions have additional legal instruments in the form of
protocols establishing them.
The implication is that the Constitutive Act which
established PAP also provided for a Protocol that would define the composition,
powers, functions and organization of the parliament. That Protocol went
through ratification before coming into effect thereby re-enforcing the
determination of member states to promote democratic principles and popular
participation, consolidate democratic institutions and culture and ensure good
governance.
Article 21 of the Constitutive
Act created the Permanent Representatives Committee whose main responsibility
is to prepare the work of the Executive Council and to act on its instructions.
However, when the PRC adopted its Rules of
Procedure, it enlarged the powers granted to it by Article 21without any
authority either in the Constitutive Act or any ratified Protocol. The
PRC acquired powers even to the point of arguably overriding certain provisions
of the Constitutive Act and the PAP Protocol.
Ordinarily, an organization’s rules of procedure
are a set of rules, ethics and customs which governs the meetings and other
operations of the organization and how that organization is administered, i.e.
the manner that it exercises the authority granted by the enabling legislation.
A rule of procedure cannot grant substantive powers beyond that granted by the
law that established the organization.
However, the PRC had through Rule 4 of its Rules of
Procedure enlarged its powers to include such areas as the power to consider
the budget of the AU; power to receive and consider the report of external
auditors of the AU; the power to propose the composition of the bureau of the
organs of the AU and many others not intended by the founders of the AU.
Interestingly, Rule 4 which contains the Powers and Functions of the PRC begins
with “The PRC shall inter alia”. And
the word inter
alia means among other things, implying that their powers are
boundless! Is this consistent with the vision of the founders of the AU.
The AU Reforms
Fortunately, in January 2017, the
Heads of State and Government of the African Union (AU) decided to embark upon
a robust process of reform of the Union, based on past experiences.
Five main areas were at the center of
the reform: Focusing on fewer priority areas with continental scope,
Institutional Realignment, Connecting the AU with African Citizenry, Management
of AU at the political and operational levels and Sustainable Financing of AU
programmes.
The key priorities of each reform area
were defined, such as political affairs, peace and security, economic
integration and global representation, the strengthening of organs excluding
policy organs (Executive council and Assembly), and the empowerment of women
and youths.
Realigning AU Institutions
On realigning African Union institutions in order
to deliver against those priorities, the 28th Ordinary Session
of the AU Assembly in January 2017, decided that the Permanent Representatives
Committee’s (PRC’s) Rules of Procedure should be reviewed and be in line with
the mandate provided for in the Constitutive Act of the AU. The Assembly
decided that the PRC should facilitate communication between the AU and the
national capitals and act as an advisory body to the Executive Council and not
as a supervisory or oversight body of the Commission. See Decision on the
outcome of the Retreat of the Assembly of the AU on Institutional Reform of the
AU: Assembly/AU/Dec. 635(XXVIII); Annex to the Assembly Decision on the Outcome
of the Retreat of the Assembly of the AU on Institutional Reform of the AU.
The PRC’s
Reluctance To Review Its Rules Of Procedure
More than two years after the Assembly decision,
PRC’s Rules of Procedure is yet to be reviewed and the PRC is still throwing
its weight by exercising oversight on PAP as if the Protocol Establishing the
Pan African Parliament does not exist!.
But one needs to understand the current internal
working of the AU to appreciate why the PRC is so powerful to the extent that
the AU decision on the review of its Rules of Procedure is yet to see the light
of the day.
The PRC as we know, prepares the agenda and even
draft decisions for the meetings of the Executive Council which in turn,
becomes the agenda and draft decisions for Assembly meetings. In effect, the
PRC decides or sets the agenda and draft decisions for both the Executive
Council and the Assembly. And as one can imagine, the PRC is not in a hurry to
put the amendment of its Rules of Procedure on the agenda.
The Need
For A PAP Resolution
In view of PRC’s obvious reluctance to implement the Assembly decision
on the review of its rules of procedure, PAP should without further hesitation,
step in by passing an appropriate resolution.
Without doubt, the current PAP Protocol gives PAP advisory and
consultative powers to exercise some oversight including passing a resolution
demanding a review of the PRC’s Rules of Procedure in line with Assembly
Decision: Assembly/AU/Dec. 635(XXVIII); Annex to the Assembly Decision on the
Outcome of the Retreat of the Assembly of the AU on Institutional Reform of the
AU.
Such a resolution would also be consistent with the vision of the
founders of the African Union in the establishment of the Pan African
Parliament as well as ensure that the PRC limits its role to that provided for
by Article 21 of the Constitutive Act of the AU.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News