Explore the Pan-African
Parliament’s role, powers and model laws, the Malabo Protocol, and challenges
involving funding and internal governance in 2026.
By Olu Ibekwe
(Originally published: 4 August 2024 | Updated: 12 October 2026)
The Pan-African Parliament
(PAP) was established to give African peoples a voice in decisions about the
continent’s development and integration. It is one of the nine organs
originally listed in Article 5 of the African Union’s Constitutive Act,
adopted in July 2000 in Lomé, Togo. Based in Midrand, South Africa, PAP
provides a continental forum where parliamentarians debate shared challenges,
promote democratic accountability and connect African Union commitments with
the legislative and oversight responsibilities of national parliaments.
Yet its name can create
expectations that exceed its present authority. PAP does not currently enact
binding laws for all African countries. Its powers remain principally advisory
and consultative, even as it develops model laws, encourages treaty
implementation and seeks a stronger place in continental decision-making.
In 2026, that
distinction matters more than ever. A new leadership under President H.E.
Dr. Fateh Boutbig has placed institutional renewal and measurable results
at the centre of its agenda. Meanwhile, an AU Executive Council decision has
opened a route towards earlier parliamentary input into selected draft AU legal
instruments.
Understanding PAP
therefore requires looking at both its founding purpose and the practical
limits within which it works: what it can do, how its recommendations reach
decision-makers, and what must change for African citizens to experience its
impact.
What is the Pan-African
Parliament?
The Pan-African
Parliament is an organ of the African Union established to promote popular
participation in Africa’s development and economic integration.
Article 17 of the AU
Constitutive Act provides for its establishment and leaves its composition,
powers, functions and organization to the relevant Protocol. PAP consequently
has a treaty-based institutional identity within the Union.
Its seat in South Africa
does not make it a department of the South African Government. South Africa is
the host country; PAP’s mandate is continental.
The Parliament’s
distinctive contribution is to introduce parliamentary debate, public concerns
and legislative experience into a system in which governments play a central
role. Its value should be assessed through the quality of that contribution and
the action it helps generate.
Why was PAP established?
PAP grew out of the
broader Pan-African aspiration for solidarity, collective self-reliance and
cooperation across national boundaries.
The institutional
foundations developed through the 1991 Abuja Treaty establishing the African
Economic Community, followed by the AU framework. The original PAP Protocol was
adopted on 2 March 2001 and entered into force on 14 December 2003. The
Parliament was inaugurated in March 2004.
Its creation addressed a
fundamental question: how could African integration involve the people whose
lives continental policies were intended to improve?
Agreements between
governments are essential, but implementation also requires legislation, public
expenditure, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen understanding. PAP was intended
to help connect those responsibilities.
That purpose remains
relevant when African states cooperate on trade, migration, food security,
climate resilience, public health and peace.
The ultimate aim of the
Pan-African Parliament is to evolve into an institution with full legislative
powers, whose members are elected by universal adult suffrage.
Who are the members of
the Pan-African Parliament?
Under the current
Protocol, each participating Member State is represented by five
parliamentarians, including at least one woman. Delegations must reflect the
diversity of political opinions in their national parliament or other
deliberative organ.
Members are elected or
designated from among the members of those national institutions. Citizens do
not currently elect PAP members through a separate continent-wide election.
A member’s term in the
Pan-African Parliament begins on the day they take the oath of office or make a
solemn declaration during a plenary session and ends when they cease to be a
member of the national parliament or other deliberative organ that designated
them.
The AU has 55 Member
States, making 275 the full numerical complement on a five-member-per-state
basis. That figure should not be confused with the number of members actually
serving or attending a particular sitting, which depends on participation,
accreditation and vacancies.
Equal national
representation allows smaller states to participate on the same numerical basis
as larger states. Political diversity within delegations is equally important:
a continental parliamentary forum benefits from the presence of different views
within each country.
PAP’s representative
purpose also extends beyond national interests. Its founding vision requires
members to consider the shared interests of African peoples.
How is PAP organized?
PAP’s work involves the
Plenary, Bureau, committees and caucuses, supported by the Secretariat.
The Plenary
The Plenary is the highest
decision-making organ of the Pan-African Parliament, comprising all duly
accredited members. It brings parliamentarians together to debate continental
issues, consider committee reports and adopt resolutions and recommendations
expressing Parliament’s collective position.
Its powers include electing
the President and four Vice-Presidents and adopting Parliament’s Rules
of Procedure, subject to the PAP Protocol. The Plenary also provides
institutional direction through its decisions and directives, within which the
Bureau exercises its management and administrative responsibilities.
Article 14 of the PAP
Protocol requires Parliament to
hold at least two ordinary sessions annually. In practice, these sessions have
routinely been held in May and October, with slight variations when
circumstances require adjustments to the parliamentary calendar.
Article 14 also provides
for extraordinary sessions. Two-thirds of the Pan-African
Parliamentarians, the Assembly or the Council may, through the Chairperson of
the OAU, request such a session by written notification addressed to the
President. The request must explain the reasons for convening the session
and specify the matters to be discussed. The President shall convene the
session, whose deliberations are limited to the matters identified in the
request. It ends once its agenda has been exhausted.
The proceedings of the
Pan-African Parliament are open to the public, unless otherwise directed
by the Bureau, supporting transparency and public engagement in its work.
The Bureau
The Bureau comprises the
President and four Vice-Presidents, representing Africa’s five regions. Article
12.5 of the PAP Protocol designates them as the Officers of the Pan-African
Parliament. Under the President’s control and direction, and subject to
directives issued by Parliament, they are responsible for managing and
administering the affairs and facilities of PAP and its organs. In discharging
these duties, the Officers are assisted by the Clerk and two Deputy Clerks.
The office of President
rotates among the five regions. Separately, Article 12.7 provides that
the President presides over parliamentary proceedings, except those held in
committee, and that, in the President’s absence, the Vice-Presidents act in
rotation in accordance with the Rules of Procedure.
H.E. Dr. Fateh Boutbig of Algeria became President on 30 April 2026,
succeeding H.E. Chief Fortune Charumbira. The First Ordinary Session of the
Seventh Parliament opened on 27 July 2026.
Under Rule 17 of the
Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, the Bureau is responsible for:
1. Managing and
administering the Parliament and its organs;
2. Regulating the procedures
relating to the financial, organizational and administrative needs in
accordance with the financial rules and regulations of the AU and matters
concerning members and the internal organization of the Parliament and its
organs;
3. Determining the draft
agenda and the programs of the Parliamentary sessions;
4. Determining the
establishment and organizational structure of the Secretariat, and formulating
staff regulations and terms and conditions of service for submission to the
Plenary for adoption;
5. Propose to Parliament
for adoption the establishment and job descriptions of its support staff;
6. Propose to the Pan
African Parliament, the appointment of the Clerk and Deputy Clerks to
Parliament
7. Preparing the draft
budget of the Parliament and its presentation to the responsible Committee;
8. Coordinating and
harmonizing the functions of the Permanent Committees;
9. Carrying out any
other functions as prescribed by Parliament or incidental to these functions.
Committees and caucuses
PAP has twelve
Permanent Committees, which examine issues in depth, undertake
consultations and develop reports and recommendations for consideration by the
Plenary. Committee sittings are routinely held in March and August, with
adjustments where circumstances require.
The Parliament also has two
thematic caucuses: the Women’s Caucus and the Youth Caucus, which promote
the participation of women and young people and advance their concerns within
continental parliamentary work.
There are five
Regional Caucuses, corresponding to the five regions recognized by the
African Union: Central, Eastern, Northern, Southern and Western Africa.
These caucuses coordinate regional participation, develop common positions and
support advocacy on continental priorities. Under PAP’s Rules of Procedure,
they are also responsible for nominating candidates for the various offices of
the Parliament, making them central to its leadership selection process.
PAP Rules of Procedure
provides for the following Permanent Committees:
a) Permanent Committee
on Rural Economy, Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment;
b) Committee on Monetary and
Financial Affairs;
c) Permanent Committee
on Cooperation, International Relations and Conflict Resolution;
d) Permanent Committee on
Transport, Industry, Communications, Energy, Science and Technology;
e) Permanent Committee
on Health, Labour and Social Affairs;
f) Permanent Committee
on Education, Culture, Tourism and Human Resources;
g) Permanent Committee on
Gender, Family, Youth, and People with Disability;
h) Permanent Committee on
Justice and Human Rights;
i) Permanent
Committee on Rules, Privileges and Discipline;
j) Permanent
Committee on Audits and Public Accounts;
The Secretariat
The Secretariat provides
administrative, procedural and technical support under the Clerk assisted by
two Deputy Clerks: the Deputy Clerk in charge of Legislative Business and
Conferences and the Deputy Clerk in charge of Finance, Administration and Human
Resources. The Clerk and Deputy Clerks are appointed by the Parliament, on
recommendation of the Bureau. It assists the elected parliamentary structures
in the discharge of their duties; it should not be presented as an independent
political organ with an equivalent mandate.
Effective parliamentary
work requires both political leadership and professional administration, with
clear responsibilities and reliable support services.
What powers does the
Pan-African Parliament have?
Article 11 of the
current Protocol provides the principal basis for PAP’s functions. These
include making recommendations, contributing to the harmonization of national
laws and examining matters relevant to continental governance.
PAP can discuss its own
budget and the AU budget before Assembly approval. It may also request AU
officials to attend its sessions, provide documents or assist its work.
These are meaningful
opportunities for scrutiny and influence. They do not amount to a general power
to compel governments to adopt PAP’s positions.
|
Area |
PAP’s present role |
Practical limit |
|
Continental policy |
Debate issues and recommend action |
Recommendations do not
automatically bind governments |
|
Legal harmonization |
Encourage compatible national
approaches |
Domestic changes require the
appropriate national processes |
|
Budget scrutiny |
Discuss budgets and make
recommendations |
PAP does not hold final AU budget
approval authority |
|
Accountability |
Seek information and question
policy choices |
It does not exercise the full
enforcement powers of a national legislature |
|
Integration |
Connect parliamentary work with
continental priorities |
Results depend on cooperation and
implementation |
The distinction between
influence and enforcement is central to understanding PAP.
A recommendation can
shape public debate, improve a policy proposal or persuade a national
parliament to act. Its effectiveness depends on the evidence behind it, the
institutions receiving it and the follow-up that occurs.
Can PAP make laws
binding on African countries?
PAP does not currently
possess a general power to enact legislation binding across AU Member States.
It nevertheless
contributes to legislative development through model laws: frameworks that
national legislatures can consider when preparing or revising domestic
legislation.
A model law offers a
common approach to a shared problem. It can help lawmakers identify suitable
standards, compare policy options and reduce unnecessary differences between
national systems. It does not become domestic law merely because PAP adopts it.
PAP’s model laws address
a broad range of development, governance and social protection priorities.
PAP’s model laws and
legislative initiatives
PAP has developed a
growing portfolio of model laws to support the harmonization of national
legislation across Africa. These instruments provide adaptable frameworks that
national parliaments can draw upon when developing or reviewing domestic laws.
Their adoption by PAP does not automatically make them binding within Member States.
It is important to
distinguish adopted model laws from drafts undergoing consultation and
proposals whose development has been authorized or announced.
Adopted model laws
|
Model law |
Adoption and subsequent
developments |
|
Model Law on Policing in Africa |
Adopted in October 2019. |
|
Model Law on Disability in Africa |
Adopted in October 2019. |
|
Model Law on Food and Nutrition
Security in Africa |
Adopted in November 2022 and
publicly launched in June 2024. |
|
Model Law on Cooperatives in
Africa |
Adopted during the June–July 2024
session and launched in October 2025. |
|
Model Law on Labour Migration in
Africa |
Adopted on 5 November 2025. |
|
Model Law on Gender Equality and
Equity |
Adopted on 5 November 2025. |
|
Model Law on Sustainable Soil
Management in Africa |
Adopted in November 2025 during
the Sixth Ordinary Session of the Sixth Legislature. |
These instruments
address matters ranging from policing and disability rights to food security,
cooperative development, labour migration, gender equality and environmental
protection. Their practical value depends on national consideration, adaptation
and implementation, supported by parliamentary oversight.
Drafts and other
model-law initiatives
PAP’s legislative work
also includes instruments at different stages of development. Approval to
formulate a model law, endorsement of a policy paper or acceptance at first
reading should be distinguished from final adoption.
|
Model law or initiative |
Stage reflected in the available
records |
|
Model Law on Factoring in Africa |
First reading was approved in July
2025. A subsequent PAP release described it among previously adopted
instruments, but its final adoption resolution and date require
clarification. |
|
Model Law on the Right to
Nationality and the Eradication of Statelessness |
The draft underwent continental
consultation in November 2025, with further technical review and plenary
consideration envisaged. Earlier references to adoption require clarification
as to whether they concerned the development resolution or the completed text. |
|
Model Law on Climate Change in
Africa |
Development was authorized in
2023. Technical and stakeholder consultations continued in 2025 and 2026,
including the September 2026 consultation in Nairobi. |
|
Cybersecurity and Artificial
Intelligence Model Law |
Development was announced in
January 2026 to support national approaches to data protection, privacy and
digital rights. |
|
Model Law on African Food Policy |
Proposed collaboration between PAP
and the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa was announced in August 2026.
This initiative is distinct from the adopted food and nutrition security
model law. |
|
Model Law on Traditional Medicines
and the Protection of Local Knowledge |
Reported as a development
initiative; its formal authorisation and latest drafting stage remain to be
confirmed. |
PAP’s expanded
partnership with Partners for Patients NGO also identifies 55
proposed health model-law titles. These cover subjects such as cancer,
malaria, vaccination, maternal and child health, access to medicines, digital
health, water and sanitation, and pandemic preparedness. They constitute a
proposed legislative work programme. Each would require the appropriate
research, consultation, drafting, legal review and parliamentary consideration
before adoption.
Related model
instruments
PAP’s contribution to
legal harmonization extends beyond instruments formally titled “model laws.”
|
Instrument |
PAP’s involvement and status |
|
African Model Double Taxation
Agreement |
Adopted by PAP in October 2019
following collaboration with the African Union Commission on International
Law. |
|
AU Model Law on Medical Products
Regulation |
Developed through collaboration
involving the AU Commission, NEPAD, PAP and other partners; endorsed by AU
Heads of State and Government in January 2016. |
|
Model Treaty for Mutual Legal
Assistance for Police Cooperation in Africa |
Its development was mandated in
May 2017 alongside the policing model-law initiative. Final adoption is not
established by the records reviewed. |
These distinctions help
identify both Parliament’s completed outputs and the wider initiatives to which
it has contributed.
How does PAP develop and
consider model laws?
PAP’s published
procedural framework sets out a process combining political authorization,
technical drafting and public consultation. The framework describes three
principal stages: initiation, formulation and adoption, followed by
implementation and monitoring activities.
|
Stage |
Principal activities |
|
Initiation and referral |
A proposal is submitted through
the Clerk to the Bureau, which identifies the Permanent Committee best placed
to lead its consideration. |
|
Assessment and authorisation |
The responsible committee examines
the need for harmonisation, the supporting AU legal and policy framework, and
the financial and technical capacity to undertake the work. The Plenary
considers its recommendation to authorise development. |
|
Research and drafting |
A policy paper establishes the
evidence and conceptual basis for the instrument. A drafting team prepares
the text, supported by technical advice and committee guidance. |
|
First reading and consultation |
The draft is presented for initial
parliamentary consideration and stakeholder input. Regional consultations
help incorporate different legal traditions, national circumstances and
community perspectives. |
|
Revision and legal scrutiny |
Consultation findings are
incorporated into the draft, which undergoes legal review and examination by
the relevant committees. |
|
Final plenary consideration |
The Plenary debates the proposed
model law and may adopt it, adopt it with amendments or return it for further
revision. |
|
Post-adoption follow-up |
The framework envisages submission
for AU consideration, dissemination, advocacy for national adaptation and
monitoring of implementation. |
The process is intended
to ensure that model laws reflect African realities and are capable of
practical use across different national legal systems. Consultation also helps
build understanding and ownership among the institutions and communities
expected to use them.
Ultimately, PAP’s
contribution should be assessed through both the quality of its model laws and
their influence on national legislation. Tracking which countries adapt an
instrument, what changes they introduce and how implementation affects citizens
would provide stronger evidence of Parliament’s impact.
These instruments
provide frameworks that national parliaments can draw upon when developing or
reviewing domestic legislation. Their practical impact depends on national
adaptation, enactment and implementation, supported by parliamentary oversight.
Their potential value
lies in national uptake. A model law becomes more useful when parliamentary
committees study it, consult affected communities and adapt relevant provisions
to local conditions.
For that reason, PAP’s
legislative contribution should be measured through implementation as well as
adoption. Tracking which countries use a model law, which provisions they
incorporate and what results follow would provide stronger evidence of impact.
What is the Malabo
Protocol, and why does it matter?
The Malabo Protocol
is the Protocol to the Constitutive Act of the African Union relating to the
Pan-African Parliament, adopted by the Twenty-Third Ordinary Session of the
Assembly held in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea on 27 June 2014. It seeks to
replace the original PAP Protocol with a revised framework that strengthens the
Parliament’s role in continental governance, broadens parliamentary
participation and improves women’s representation.
Its importance lies in
addressing the gap between PAP’s founding aspiration to represent African
peoples and its presently limited advisory and consultative authority. However,
the revised Protocol has not entered into force, so its proposed changes must
be distinguished from the powers PAP currently exercises.
What would the Malabo
Protocol change?
The revised Protocol
would formally designate PAP as the legislative organ of the African Union.
That designation requires careful explanation. Under Article 8, the AU Assembly
would determine the subjects on which PAP could propose draft model laws, with
those proposals submitted to the Assembly for consideration and approval. It
would therefore establish a stronger but defined legislative role, while
retaining substantial authority within the Assembly.
The Protocol would also
give a clearer treaty basis to PAP’s participation in AU affairs through
consideration of reports, opinions on referred draft legal instruments, budget
discussions and cooperation with national and regional parliaments. These
provisions could help connect continental policymaking with national
legislative experience and implementation requirements.
Changes to
representation would be significant. Each Member State would continue to have
five representatives, but at least two would have to be women, compared
with the minimum of one under the current framework. Pending arrangements for
direct elections, national parliaments or other deliberative organs would elect
PAP representatives from outside their own membership. This would alter
the present system, under which PAP members are selected from among serving
national parliamentarians.
Taken together, these
reforms could strengthen PAP’s institutional identity and its contribution to
African integration. Their effectiveness would still depend on adequate
resources, workable procedures and sustained cooperation with other AU
institutions and national legislatures.
Ratification remains the
obstacle
The principal obstacle
is completing the ratification process required to bring the revised framework
into operation. The Protocol enters into force 30 days after a simple
majority of AU Member States deposit their instruments of ratification with
the Chairperson of the AU Commission. With 55 Member States, that means 28
deposits.
As explained in African
Parliamentary News’s analysis of PAP’s Senegal advocacy mission, the AU
Assembly indicated in February 2025 that 13 further ratifications were
required, implying 15 at that point.
Signature, ratification
and deposit are separate steps. Signing does not complete a state’s consent to
be bound. The necessary national procedures must be concluded, and the
instrument must be deposited with the AU Commission to count towards the
entry-into-force threshold.
This explains the
importance of targeted advocacy such as PAP’s September 2026 Senegal mission.
Effective engagement must identify where the national process has stalled,
address questions about the proposed institutional changes and establish which
authorities are responsible for completing the remaining steps.
National parliaments
have an essential role in that effort. They can scrutinize the Protocol,
undertake the approvals required under their constitutional systems and hold
governments accountable for progress towards ratification and deposit.
The challenge is
therefore to turn political support for a stronger PAP into completed treaty
action. Until the entry-into-force requirements are met, the original Protocol
remains the governing framework.
Read more: Why PAP’s Senegal Mission Matters for the Malabo Protocol’s
Ratification.
Challenges facing
ratification of the Malabo Protocol
Ratification of the
Malabo Protocol faces political, institutional and procedural obstacles that
vary across Member States. Its proposed changes raise questions about the
distribution of authority within the AU, the selection of PAP representatives
from outside national parliamentary membership, the requirement for at least
two women in each delegation and the resources needed to implement the revised
framework. Progress can also be slowed by competing legislative priorities,
changes in government or parliamentary leadership, and weak coordination
between ministries and national legislatures. Where lawmakers receive limited information
about the Protocol’s purpose and implications, political support may not
translate into completed ratification procedures and deposit of the instrument
with the AU Commission. Effective advocacy therefore requires country-specific
engagement: identifying the outstanding steps, addressing substantive concerns
and securing a clear timetable for action. PAP must also demonstrate how a
stronger continental Parliament would support national legislatures, democratic
accountability and African integration.
What changed for PAP’s
role in AU governance in 2026?
An important development
came through Executive Council Decision EX.CL/Dec.1362(XLIX), adopted in
July 2026.
Paragraph 7 requests the
AU Commission to engage PAP, the Economic, Social and Cultural Council
(ECOSOCC), and the African Union Commission on International Law (AUCIL) on
possible arrangements for structured advisory input into selected draft AU
legal instruments before their submission to the competent Policy Organs.
Paragraph 8 requires the
Ministerial Committee to report on implementation at the next Ordinary Session
of the Executive Council.
The decision creates an
opportunity; it does not establish a completed consultation system or confer
binding legislative powers.
Its potential significance
lies in timing. Parliamentary input can be more useful while an instrument is
being developed, when questions about domestic implementation, public
acceptance and legislative feasibility can still shape its provisions.
A practical response
would require PAP to establish a clear process for receiving drafts, assigning
committee responsibility, consulting stakeholders and submitting advice within
agreed deadlines.
African Parliamentary
News’s related analysis examines this opening in greater detail: [Executive
Council Opens Door for PAP Input into Draft AU Legal Instruments](https://www.africanparliamentarynews.com/2026/09/executive-council-opens-door-for-pap.html).
How does PAP relate to
other African Union institutions?
The AU’s institutional
design gives different organs different responsibilities. Recognition as an AU
organ does not produce equality of decision-making power.
The Assembly brings
together Heads of State and Government. The Executive Council operates at ministerial
level. The Permanent Representatives Committee comprises Member States’
representatives, while the AU Commission performs the Union’s secretariat
functions.
PAP contributes a
parliamentary perspective within that structure. It cannot assume the functions
assigned to the other organs, but its contribution deserves an effective route
into their deliberations.
In September 2026, President
Boutbig and AUC Deputy Chairperson H.E. Selma Haddadi agreed to
strengthen coordination between the Parliament and Commission.
For such cooperation to
produce institutional value, meetings should lead to defined responsibilities,
timely exchanges of information and responses to parliamentary recommendations.
A Parliament needs to know whether its advice was accepted, modified or
declined, and why.
What is PAP’s role in
democracy, elections and human rights?
PAP’s stated objectives
include promoting democracy, human rights, transparency and accountable
governance. It also encourages national and regional parliaments to ratify and
integrate AU treaties into their legal systems.
Those responsibilities
can support parliamentary debate about electoral integrity, civic
participation, equality and the rule of law.
Election observation,
where PAP members participate in authorized missions, can contribute to that
wider effort. Observation should be understood alongside the longer work of
improving electoral laws, institutions and democratic practice.
PAP is not a court and
does not determine binding outcomes in national electoral disputes. Its
contribution lies in scrutiny, recommendations, advocacy and cooperation with
the competent institutions.
The same distinction
applies to human rights. PAP can help bring concerns into continental debate
and encourage legislative responses. It does not replace the African Commission
on Human and Peoples’ Rights or the African Court.
How does PAP contribute
to peace and security?
PAP’s relationship with
the AU Peace and Security Council has a specific treaty basis.
Article 18 of the PSC
Protocol provides for close working relations with PAP. It also provides for
reports to the Parliament when requested through the Commission Chairperson,
and an annual report on the continent’s peace and security situation.
These provisions offer a
basis for parliamentary scrutiny of conflict prevention and the human
consequences of insecurity.
Parliamentarians can
contribute questions about displacement, humanitarian protection, public
expenditure and the domestic measures needed to support peace commitments. Parliamentary
diplomacy can also sustain dialogue between legislatures.
PAP does not command
peace operations. Its contribution is to strengthen the parliamentary dimension
of Africa’s peace and security efforts.
Why are national
parliaments essential to PAP’s effectiveness?
National parliaments
connect continental commitments with domestic lawmaking, expenditure and
oversight.
A PAP recommendation may
require a national committee to investigate an issue, a legislature to revise a
law, or a government to explain its implementation plans. Without those
connections, continental debate can remain distant from citizens’ daily
experience.
A stronger relationship
would involve regular reports from national PAP delegations, referral of
relevant recommendations to domestic committees and public tracking of
follow-up.
Regional parliamentary
institutions are also important partners. Cooperation can help identify shared
priorities, exchange legislative experience and avoid duplicating work.
PAP’s effectiveness
therefore depends partly on whether its members carry useful continental
proposals into their national institutions and bring national implementation
challenges back to PAP.
How does PAP support
Agenda 2063 and African integration?
Agenda 2063 provides the
AU’s long-term development framework. PAP can contribute by connecting its
ambitions with legislative choices, budget priorities and public
accountability.
The 2026 AU theme
focuses on sustainable water availability and safe sanitation. PAP’s July 2026
work on the theme examined investment gaps, water management and links between
soil health, water security and climate resilience.
These subjects
illustrate the practical parliamentary questions behind continental
commitments: which laws need improvement, where funding is missing, and which
institutions must account for delivery?
PAP’s new leadership has
also identified AfCFTA implementation, digital transformation, peace and
security, and the empowerment of women and youth among its priorities.
For integration to
benefit citizens, parliamentary engagement must help translate these priorities
into identifiable national action.
How can civil society
and citizens engage with PAP?
PAP’s stated
responsibilities include cooperation with civil society, community-based
organizations and grassroots organizations.
Such engagement can
improve parliamentary work by supplying evidence about how laws and policies
affect people in practice.
Organizations seeking to
contribute should identify the relevant committee or consultation, prepare
focused submissions and confirm the applicable participation arrangements.
Access requirements depend on the activity concerned.
A useful submission
explains the problem, provides credible evidence, identifies the responsible
institutions and proposes action within PAP’s mandate.
Public access to
reports, recommendations and follow-up information would also help citizens
assess the Parliament’s contribution.
The Challenges Facing
the Parliament
The Pan-African
Parliament faces a combination of limited powers, financial constraints,
administrative dependence and weak implementation of its recommendations. These
challenges help explain why its treaty-based mandate has not always translated
into the influence or public visibility envisaged at its establishment.
Limited powers and
delayed institutional reform
PAP’s advisory and
consultative status limits its ability to secure action. It can debate
continental issues, request information, develop model laws and recommend
reforms, but it generally depends on other AU institutions and national
authorities to implement its proposals.
The continued delay in
bringing the Malabo Protocol into force has prolonged this transitional
arrangement. However, PAP’s effectiveness also depends on how consistently it
uses its existing powers, the quality of its recommendations and the
institutional support available for follow-up.
An imbalance between
parliamentary mandate and executive influence
The African Union remains
predominantly executive-driven. Heads of State and Government, ministers and
ambassadors occupy influential positions in the institutions through which
continental decisions, budgets and administrative proposals are considered.
PAP introduces a
different representative dimension: its national delegations are required to
reflect diverse political opinions, including perspectives beyond those of
governing parties. Yet the resources and administrative processes needed to
exercise that parliamentary mandate remain substantially influenced by
executive institutions.
As examined in APN’s
article, Who Really Controls the Pan-African Parliament and Its Budget?,
inclusion among AU organs does not produce equality in institutional power,
operational autonomy or access to resources. The Commission and Permanent
Representatives Committee occupy influential positions in the processes
affecting PAP’s funding, staffing and institutional development.
Their responsibilities
for coordination and financial scrutiny are necessary. The challenge is to
ensure that these functions respect the authority assigned to Parliament and
its Officers under the PAP Protocol. Common financial accountability should
support lawful parliamentary activity without displacing Parliament’s responsibility
to determine its priorities.
Budgetary contraction
and staffing constraints
The scale of PAP’s
financial contraction illustrates the practical consequences. Its approved
budget declined from approximately US$32.46 million in 2016 to US$10.35
million in 2025, a reduction of nearly 68 per cent. Compared with
its approximately US$18.5 million budget in 2019, the decline exceeded 40
per cent.
Such reductions
constrain the capacity to convene sessions, sustain committee work, consult
stakeholders, undertake fact-finding missions, develop model laws and
communicate with African citizens. Shortages of researchers, legislative
drafters, interpreters and other essential personnel further weaken the support
available to members.
The Protocol
nevertheless gives PAP an express budgetary role. Article 11.2 provides
for parliamentary discussion of its own budget and the wider Community budget
before Assembly approval. Article 15.2 assigns PAP responsibility for
drawing up its budget in accordance with the applicable financial rules, with
approval resting with the Assembly during the present phase of its development.
Giving practical effect
to these provisions requires PAP’s financial proposals to reflect its mandate
and for parliamentary recommendations to receive meaningful consideration
within the AU budget process.
The gap between
recommendations and implementation
Adopting a resolution or
model law is only one stage of parliamentary work. Its value depends on what
follows: consideration by the relevant AU institution, legislative action at
national level, budgetary provision or changes in administrative practice.
PAP needs stronger
arrangements for tracking referrals, obtaining institutional responses and
reporting implementation. National delegations should also regularly brief
their legislatures and refer relevant PAP recommendations to domestic
committees.
The 2026 opening for
structured advisory input into selected draft AU legal instruments could
strengthen PAP’s influence earlier in the policymaking process. Its usefulness
will depend on timely access to drafts, adequate technical support and feedback
explaining how Parliament’s advice was treated.
Internal governance,
credibility and public engagement
PAP’s own performance is
equally important. Clear procedures, respect for the governing Protocol, sound
financial management and transparent reporting strengthen its credibility when
it seeks greater institutional authority.
Citizens also need
accessible evidence of what Parliament achieves. Reporting should show how its
work contributes to national legislation, better public services, accountable
government and continental cooperation.
Addressing these
challenges therefore requires action across the AU system and within PAP
itself. Member States and AU institutions must respect and support its
treaty-based responsibilities, while Parliament must demonstrate that its
resources, deliberations and recommendations produce practical value for
African peoples.
Interference in internal
governance and prolonged uncertainty over the Rules
A major challenge facing
PAP is external intervention in matters that its founding Protocol assigns to
Parliament itself. These include adopting its Rules of Procedure, electing its
leadership and managing its internal affairs. Ensuring compliance with the
Protocol is necessary, but that process should respect Parliament’s
treaty-based authority and provide a clear, consistent route for correcting
identified defects.
The handling of the
amended Rules of Procedure illustrates the problem. In October 2023, the
amendments were suspended following concerns about their consistency with the
Protocol, including the introduction of a fixed three-year Bureau tenure
considered incompatible with Article 12.3. A more proportionate approach would
have been to identify and suspend the inconsistent provisions while preserving
amendments that could lawfully operate independently. A broader suspension
disrupted institutional arrangements and prolonged uncertainty over the
framework governing Parliament.
The episode formed part
of the leadership crisis that lasted approximately seven months, from August
2023 to March 2024. The subsequent change in the Office of the Legal Counsel’s
position on the three-year tenure created further uncertainty. Having
previously advised that the fixed term was inconsistent with Article 12.3, the
OLC later supported its retention without a corresponding amendment to the
governing Protocol. This inconsistency complicated Parliament’s efforts to
establish stable and legally coherent rules.
Since its November 2024
sitting, PAP has pursued the revision and alignment of its Rules of Procedure.
Despite successive deliberations and efforts to address the identified
concerns, the process has remained unresolved. The prolonged involvement of
external institutions raises a fundamental question: how can Parliament
effectively exercise its express power to adopt its own Rules when completion
of that process remains dependent on competing interpretations and
interventions outside its elected structures?
Legal advice should
clarify the applicable framework and help Parliament resolve inconsistencies.
Changes in that advice require a transparent explanation of their legal basis,
particularly where they affect leadership tenure, institutional continuity and
previously adopted corrective measures.
The appropriate response
is to ensure that Parliament’s Rules conform to the Protocol while preserving
its authority to adopt them. External scrutiny should identify specific
defects, provide consistent guidance and facilitate timely correction. An
indefinite alignment process weakens parliamentary autonomy, diverts attention
from substantive work and leaves the institution vulnerable to recurring
disputes over its internal governance.
High turnover of the
Members of Parliament
Another major challenge
facing the Pan-African Parliament is the high turnover of its Members. Under
the current PAP Protocol, a Member’s tenure is tied to continued membership of
the national parliament or deliberative organ that designated them. Because
Member States follow different electoral calendars, changes in national
delegations occur throughout the parliamentary cycle, requiring PAP to
regularly swear in new Members.
This turnover disrupts
continuity in committee work, weakens institutional memory and requires
repeated investment in induction and capacity building. Experienced Members may
leave while legislative initiatives, model laws or oversight activities are
still underway, leaving their successors to familiarize themselves with ongoing
work and continental priorities. The resulting loss of accumulated knowledge
and expertise can slow implementation of parliamentary decisions and weaken
follow-up with national legislatures. Stronger institutional documentation,
structured induction and effective handover arrangements are therefore
essential to preserving continuity and sustaining the Parliament’s capacity to
discharge its mandate.
What would make
PAP more effective?
A stronger PAP requires
both institutional reform and disciplined use of its existing mandate.
Priorities include
implementing the 2026 opening for structured advisory input, strengthening
national parliamentary follow-up, supporting committee research and
consultation, and maintaining rules consistent with the governing Protocol.
Ratification of the
Malabo Protocol remains an important reform objective. Meanwhile, PAP can
improve the quality, visibility and practical usefulness of the work it is
already authorized to undertake.
African citizens need to
see how continental parliamentary activity relates to matters such as
affordable services, accountable government, food security and freedom of
movement. Clear evidence of that connection would strengthen PAP’s public
standing.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
QUESTIONS
Where is the Pan-African
Parliament located?
PAP’s seat is in
Midrand, South Africa. It serves a continental mandate as an AU organ.
Who is the President of
PAP in 2026?
H.E. Dr. Fateh Boutbig of Algeria became President on 30 April 2026.
How many members does
each country send to PAP?
Each participating
Member State has five representatives. Under the current Protocol, at least one
must be a woman.
Are PAP members directly
elected by African citizens?
There is currently no
separate continent-wide popular election for PAP. Members are elected or
designated by their national parliament or other deliberative organ.
Are PAP model laws
binding?
They are frameworks for
national consideration. Domestic legal effect requires the appropriate national
legislative processes.
Has the Malabo Protocol
entered into force?
It has not entered into
force. PAP continues to operate under the original Protocol.
Did the 2026 Executive
Council decision give PAP legislative powers?
Decision EX.CL/Dec.1362(XLIX)
requests engagement on possible arrangements for earlier advisory input into
selected draft AU legal instruments. It does not confer binding legislative
authority.
A parliamentary voice
that must translate into action
PAP gives the African
Union a forum for parliamentary debate and a channel through which the concerns
of African peoples can enter continental governance.
Its mandate already
offers scope for useful work. The challenge is to connect that work with
institutions able to implement it, while pursuing the reforms needed to
strengthen its authority.
The opportunity opened
in 2026 will be judged by the arrangements developed and the contribution they
enable. PAP’s wider success will depend on whether its debates, advice and
model laws help produce better decisions and demonstrable improvements for African
citizens.
Sources and further
reading
- [AU Constitutive Act](https://au.int/sites/default/files/pages/34873-file-constitutiveact_en.pdf)
- [Original PAP Protocol:
treaty text and status](https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-treaty-establishing-african-economic-community-relating-pan-african-parliament)
- [About the Pan-African
Parliament](https://pap.au.int/en/about)
- [PAP’s role and legal
responsibilities](https://pap.au.int/en/role-and-legal-responsibilities)
- [Malabo Protocol:
treaty text and status](https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-constitutive-act-african-union-relating-pan-african-parliament)
- [Executive Council
decisions, July 2026: see EX.CL/Dec.1362(XLIX), paragraphs 7–8](https://au.int/sites/default/files/EX%20CL%20Dec%201352%20-%201363%20%28XLIX%29%20_E.pdf)
- [Peace and Security
Council Protocol: see Article 18](https://www.peaceau.org/uploads/psc-protocol-en.pdf)
- [Opening of the First
Ordinary Session of the Seventh Parliament](https://pap.au.int/en/news/press-releases/2026-07-27/president-pan-african-parliament-signals-new-chapter-continenta)
-
Status of AU Treaties: https://au.int/en/treaties

No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News