- An analysis of global trade
realities/AfCFTA
By Dr Maurice Ezuruike (International Legislative Consultant)
The African Union (AU)
with its 55
Member States is aspiring for
permanent membership of the Group of Twenty (G-20), comparable to the European
Union (EU) which is the 20th full member of the G-20 with its 28 member states.The
EU’s membership alsoincludes three of its Member States France, Germany, and
Italy who are also permanent members while South Africa is currently the only
G20 member from Africa.
The G20 is the premier forum for
international cooperation amongst the world’s major advanced and emerging
economies on the most important aspects of the internationaleconomic and
financial agenda. It is established on the objective of creating a platform for
policy coordination between its members in order to achieve global economic stability,
sustainable growth, promote financial regulations that reduce risks and prevent
future financial crises and create a new international financial architecture.
The
G20 countries cumulatively account for around 90% of global GDP, 80% of global
trade, and two thirds of the world’s population. It consists of Argentina,
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy,
Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, UK and
USA.
As an intergovernmental forum, it focuses on major issues
related to the global economy and more particularly on international financial
stability, climate change mitigation and sustainable development.
There has been long standing recognition that multilateralism
is the most significant avenue to global stability and economic sustainability.
Regrettably, Africa’s past engagements
at the global arena have been characterized by an experience and history of uncoordinated
economic governance and a convergence of fragmented economic frameworks.
Consequently, on issues with far reaching implications on the continent such as
climate change, pandemics and security, Africa is relegated to the background
and made to absorb the decisions made by other global nations.
However, there is a new paradigm with the AU’s growing
centrality in Africa’s economic governance as manifested in the introduction of
Africa’s overarching development plan – Agenda 2063 which is operationalized by
the African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA). AfCFTA embodies tremendous opportunities for growth and
sustainable development with the potential to create a continental free-trade zone and a combined
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of USD$3.4 trillion. Considering that it emphasizes
the reduction of tariffs and non-tariff barriers, and the facilitation of
free movement of people and labor, right of residence, right of establishment,
and investment, AfCFTA will unite all 55 member states of the
African Union under a common market with a population of over 1.2 billion
people. With a booming middle class and the prospects of eliminating import
duties and reduction in non-tariff barriers, AfCFTA has the potential to boost
intra-African trade by 52.3 percent and transform it as the world’s
largest free trade area since the formation of the World Trade Organization.
The potential impact of this economic blueprint to global
economic governance has made the AU a new sought out bride with the G20. The support
from leaders of industrialized nations to the admission of the AU into this
global relations structure have been phenomenal.
French President Emmanuel Macron said that he “supports the
full and complete integration of the African Union into the G20” and
comparatively in the same way as the European Union is a member.
Chinese President Xi Jinping said that Beijing will support
the African Union in its decades-long quest to join the G20.
US President Biden in acknowledging AfCFTA as a major
economic blueprint to spur industrialization in Africa if properly implemented reaffirmed
his commitment to support a permanent seat for the African Union at the G20.
Undoubtedly, the impetus to these influx of support by these
global leaders have been predicated on the development by the AU of regional
integration instruments and processes comparable to the EU which is the only regional
organization with membership at the G20 and whose membership in the G20 has
motivated the support for the AU.
AU’s quest for G20 membership if realized will not only ensure
the constructive engagement of African nations on critical global challenges
relating more particularly to international financial stability, climate change
mitigation and sustainable development, it will also enhance Africa’s access to
common framework for debt restructuring and debt service suspension initiative.
On the other hand, the inclusion of the AU will enhance G20’s global influence,
strengthen global economic governance and effectiveness in the implementation
of G20 endorsed policies with a corresponding coherence in the coordination of
policies in Africa.
The prospects envisioned in AfCFTA by the global leaders and
upon which their support for AU inclusion to the G20is anchored, have made the
successful implementation of AfCFTA an absolute imperative if the AU’s quest
for G-20 membership is to be accorded any credibility or legitimacy in
international relations structure.
However
of great concern is the fact that AfCFTA is fraught with critical challenges
that several economic experts have identified as potential impediments to
maximizing its full benefits. Notable amongst them are the disparities that
exist in the level of institutional competencies within member states of the
African Union to implement the foundational principles of the agreement, the
high level of dilapidated and non-existent essential infrastructural framework,
weak fiscal and monetary policy, the lack of ratification of the agreement by
some AU member states, political instability andoverlapping
memberships in regional economic communities.
These surmountable challenges underscore the imperative to
engage relevant organs within the AU governance matrix with demonstrable capacities
to mitigate the institutional impediments to the full realization of the
objectives of AfCFTA.
Concededly, when you
consider the impediments identified by experts and the need to establish an
effective mitigation framework, the Pan African Parliament is uniquely equipped
with the relevant capacity to establish legal and legislative framework to
harmonize competing regional economic agreements, ensure complete ratification
by all member states and develop model laws covering trade in goods and
services, investment, intellectual property rights and competition policy.
This
is far more pertinent when you consider that the operational phase of the
AfCFTA has been launched with defined five key instruments that will govern the
agreement and the need to
inculcate them in Member States’ respective National Development Plans. The key instruments that were adopted consist of the Rules
of Origin; the Tariff concessions; online mechanism on monitoring, reporting
and elimination of non-tariff barriers (NTB’s); the Pan-African payment and
settlement system; and the African Trade Observatory. There is need to develop national strategies to guide the
implementation of the operational phase of AfCFTA and to also ensure that the
principles of these operational instruments are efficiently integrated
into national development strategies and priorities.
Because
of the already strong and cordial relations between the Pan African Parliament
and National Parliaments in Africa, PAP can effectively establish a platform to
articulate coherent guidelines for implementation of the five operational
instruments that will govern AfCFTA
and for generating legislative underpinnings to mitigate trading barriers.
The
Pan African Parliament has historically adopted programmes that strengthen
continental frameworks and instruments and has established robust mechanisms
whereby members of Pan African Parliament take back critical parliamentary
resolutions, debates and issues affecting ordinary citizens to member states. Pan African Parliamentarians by their unique responsibility
in the development of national budgetary processes are suitably situated to reflect
the principles of these operational strategies in their national budget
priorities and give it more effect.
Another
major huddle to AfCFTA is the eight regional economic communities (RECs) that
currently exist in Africa with overlapping memberships. This creates the
potential for fragmentation and incoherence especially when one considers
disparities in levels of regional trading arrangements and the competing
strategies for economic integration. This is further compounded by existing
free trade agreements already negotiated by respective members of regional
economic communities as well as the regional and national trading arrangements
with other countries, such as the economic partnership agreements (EPAs)
that some African countries and country groups have negotiated with the EU.These present a unique challenge on
howthis new AfCFTA agreement will operate and illustrate the
need for harmonization especially in areas where there is conflicting trade
positions with AfCFTA.
The
Pan African Parliament has demonstrated the capacity to assemble the regional
communities for cooperation and relationship. It has since its inception
strengthened ties with regional and national parliaments and pursued programmes
aimed at integrating the African continent within the framework of the
establishment of the African Union consistent with its foundational objective
of facilitating cooperation and development in Africa and facilitating
cooperation among regional economic communities and their parliamentary fora.
Through this platform and particularly the “Speakers
Conference”, the continent can sensitize member states on the different routes
that regions have adopted to pursue economic integration, offer unique
opportunity to understand how to accommodate the varying development levels,
articulate efficient models, and establish a platform for harmonization so that
the various regimes and models adopted by member states operate in a manner
that enhances coherence in an already complex trading system.
By creating this platform, PAP has made it easier for
leaders of various regional economic communities to come together and review
existing strategic frameworks, and existing regional or multinational trade
agreements in the various African States, evaluate the potential
development impacts and extrapolate relevant factors to ensure that the
existing agreements are coherent and supportive of sustainable development in
the continent. It can also analyze the legislative underpinnings of the
frameworks, establish coherent mechanism for achieving the objectives of the
agreement and articulate concrete institutional framework of
coordination and harmonization with existing regional communities and
trading ties with other partners.
The AfCFTA framework also envisions an agreement that
will continue to evolve over time as more negotiations are planned. The
efficiency of this process will require the engagement of PAP to guide the
establishment of a functional legal, regulatory and legislative framework for continental
integration by its ability to develop model laws.
Another major impediment to AfCFTA is the absence of
universal ratification by Member States. This presents a unique challenge that
must be rectified if the suboptimal impacts of this trade agreement
to Africa’s development and economic transformation are to be derived.
The African Union record on the ratification of this agreement reflects that
only 44 of the African Union’s (AU) 55 member States have ratified the
agreement, although fifty-four AU member States have signed the AfCFTA with the
exception of Eritrea. The implication is that while AfCFTA is in effect for
those 44 of the African Union’s (AU) 55 member States that have ratified
the agreement, the countries that have not ratified will be outside of the
process. The efficacy of this agreement will require the participation and
cooperation of the entire member states of the African Union. While
ratification of the agreement does not require the entire member states, it
will however require the engagement of all member states for optimal results.
This makes full ratification an absolute economic necessity.
The Pan African Parliament possesses enormous experience in
fostering and accelerating
the ratification and domestication of various continental
instruments especially those that enhance continental integration. PAP’s remarkable success in this
process is strengthened by its ties with Regional and National parliaments
through its annual conference of Speakers of African National Parliaments and
Parliaments of Regional Economic Communities. Through
this conference, Africa’s regional and national parliaments are sensitized on
African Union decisions especially the legal instruments and the need to
achieve speedy ratification and domestication.
Undeniably the agreement’s success in promoting seamless trade across
the continent and promoting the movement of Africans within the continent will
hinge on developing viable legislative infrastructure aimed at mitigating the
barriers to a complete ratification process. PAP has the unique and historical experience
and success in articulating and implementing coherent strategies and proffering
parliamentary pathways to sustaining speedy ratification of AU legal
instruments and will definitely replicate that success with the AfCFTA.
The global expectations and support from global leaders are remarkably high and the intrinsic benefits of AfCFTA are not only significant to sustainable development in Africa but also unquestionably consequential to AU’s quest for a permanent seat at the G-20. AU should exploit the unique platform provided through PAP to actualize the objectives of AfCFTA. This will reaffirm the credibility and perceived economic strength of Africa as collectively embodied and consolidated in the AU and accelerate its quest to contribute to a more prosperous future for the peoples of Africa by promoting collective self-reliance, economic recovery, strengthening continental solidarity and building a sense of common destiny among the peoples of Africa.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News