Suspension of Guinea Will Not Affect Fouta Djallon Highlands Programme - AFC Chairman - AFRICAN PARLIAMENTARY NEWS

Breaking

memfysadvert

memfysadvert
memfys hospital Enugu

Monday, December 6, 2021

Suspension of Guinea Will Not Affect Fouta Djallon Highlands Programme - AFC Chairman


By Melvin TejanMansaray, Abuja-Nigeria, Saturday 4th December 2021

The Chairman of the Administration and Finance Committee (AFC)  - Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Commission, Mohamed NurudeenIsmaila has said that the suspension of Guinea, Conakry will not affect the implementation of the Fouta Djallon Highlands Programme.

“The overall objective of the Regional Integrated Development Programme of the Fouta Djallon Highlands is to ensure the protection and rational use of the natural resources of the Highlands and its areas of influence to contribute to sustainable development and improve the living standards of the population in the highland areas and sub-basins of member countries of the Programme. This will be achieved by reversing the trend in natural resource degradation in the sub-basins of member countries of the Programme,” the AFC reported.

Fouta Djallon is a highland region in the center of Guinea in West Africa. It consists mainly of rolling grasslands, at an average elevation of about 900 m (3,000 ft). The highest point, Mount Loura, rises to 1,515 m (4,970 ft). The plateau consists of thick sandstone formations that overlie granitic basement rock. Erosion by rain and rivers has carved deep jungle canyons and valleys into the sandstone.

In an exclusive interview with this Writer,  at the ongoing ECOWAS Parliament's  Second Ordinary Session of 2021 (November 29th to December 18th, 2021)  just after presenting the draft 2022 Community Budget of the ECOWAS  Commission on Saturday 4th December 2021  at the  International Conference  Center, Garki,  Abuja-Nigeria, Ismaila said that  the  proposed  2022  UA 393.612.400  Community Budget is realistic, noting that “the budget is based on realistic  figures on  the initial income."

" We realized that we were not able to mobilize a hundred percent in previous years, we saw that mobilization rate was maximum eighty percent, so we revised it to eighty percent, which is very positive," Ismaila said.

On the concern of Hon. CalifaSeidi’, Guinea Bissau as to how will the military takeover in Guinea, Conakry, and  subsequent suspension of  Guinea and Mali by the Authority of Heads of State  affect the  implementation of the Fouta  Djallon Programme, Chairman Ismaila said the concerns expressed by a Member of the ECOWAS  Parliament is in place but  the  suspension will not affect the implementation of the Programme.

“The suspension of Guinea from the ECOWAS will not affect the fruition or the  implementation of the Fouta Djallon Programme. Guinea is only suspended from the ECOWAS and in the protocol, when you are on suspension you are so bound by all obligations of ECOWAS.  The suspension is just a symbolic gesture. We also think that eventually, they will come back. They are not going to be suspended forever. Why should we suspend Programmes because of the suspension of a Member State? Besides,  theProgramme is not only for  Guinea. It is for the other Member States. The benefits are not only for Guinea, it benefits other member states too. If you read the memorandum, you will realize that the Fouta Djallon Highlands is the source  (water tower)  and it cuts across the Niger River and the Mano River,” Chairman Ismaila said.

Questioned on what if the military government in Conakry becomes reluctant to cooperate with the ECOWAS in retaliation of the Authority of Heads of  State decision to suspend them  from the regional body, Chairman  Ismail said, “ We don’t foresee any reluctance on the part of the Guinean government. They will not be reluctant because the Programme belongs to the entire Community. The benefits are for the Community peoples and I don’t see the Guinean government being reluctant.”

The AFC Chairman was speaking following the presentation of the final report of the  ‘Thirtieth Meetingof the Administration and Finance Committee,’ held from 25th November – 2nd December 2021 in Abuja-Nigeria for which Guinea and  Mali did not participate due to their suspension from all ECOWAS  governing bodies by the Authority of Heads of State and Government.

Represented at the meeting were representatives of ECO Institutions and Specialized Agencies such as the ECOWAS Commission, ECOWAS Parliament, Community Court of Justice, West African Health Organization (WAHO), Intergovernmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), and the Office of the Auditor-General.

As part of its adoption of agenda and work programme, it was resolved that as item No.8 , ‘Presentation and Consideration of Memorandum on the Institutional Framework for the Regional Integrated Development Programme  of the  Fouta Djallon Highlands.’

The AFC’s final   report indicated that  at the thirtieth   meeting of the AFC, “ The Commissioner  in charge of Agriculture, Environment and Water Resources presented a memorandum on the institutional arrangement of the Regional Integrated Development Programme  of the Fouta Djallon Highlands for ECOWAS Commission to bear the costs of  supporting the Programme Coordinator based in Abuja and the Programme Observatory Officer of the Programme based in Guinea.”

The AFC 77th Session of the ECOWAS Council of Ministers in Monrovia on 16th December 2016 approved the transfer of the Fouta Djallon Programme from the African Union to the ECOWAS   and the Transfer Act on the transfer of PRAI MFD from the African Union to the ECOWAS, signed on 24th October 2018 in Addis Ababa took effect from that date.

The annual operating budget of the Programme is estimated at UA 201,719,68 with the need to recruit a Program Coordination Officer and the Programme Observatory Officer assisted by a driver.

The AFC reportedly lauded the memorandum of the Programme after seeking clarifications and recommended to the Council that it consider and approve it. The AFC however further requested that quarterly performance reports should be submitted to the ECOWAS Commission and bi-annual reports to AFC.

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: Comment expressed do not reflect the opinion of African Parliamentary News